Hello...
I have a database that is replicated across two servers using transactional replication, which works ok. However, I have found that the table sizes on the primary and secondary servers are significantally different even though they have the same number of rows. The tables are far bigger on the primary server than the secondary one.
Any ideas why this is happening and how it could be fixed?
Cheers,
Neil
I have a database that is replicated across two servers using transactional replication, which works ok. However, I have found that the table sizes on the primary and secondary servers are significantally different even though they have the same number of rows. The tables are far bigger on the primary server than the secondary one.
Any ideas why this is happening and how it could be fixed?
Cheers,
Neil