Does anyone have experience with putting SQL Server on the same physical machine as a Windows Terminal Server 2003? I know Microsoft might frown upon it, but if I have enough memory and enough CPU power, is there a problem? I have a client with only 5 users and the Application they need to run has to go on a Terminal Server - and the DB is SQL Server.
It seems like overkill to make this client buy 2 servers for 5 users...
Please let me know if anyone has had experience with this or any general thoughts would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance!
It seems like overkill to make this client buy 2 servers for 5 users...
Please let me know if anyone has had experience with this or any general thoughts would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance!