Simple route question

[yert33]

I'm new to routers. Cisco 2600. T1 on the outside, ethernet on the inside.

Question: I see 2 route statements below. I suspect that one is unneeded (maybe a sloppy leftover fom a previous config?) since the x.x.x.53 is the correct address for my ISP while no one knows what the x.x.x.105 address is....

Is this a mistake?

TIA

Using 873 out of 29688 bytes
!
version 12.0
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
!
hostname xxxxx
!
boot system flash c2600-is-mz.120-7.T.bin
enable password xxxxxxxx
!
!
!
!
!
memory-size iomem 10
ip subnet-zero
!
!
!
!
!
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
description xxxxxxxx
ip address my.inside.ip.249 255.255.255.248
no ip directed-broadcast
speed 10
half-duplex
!
interface Serial0/0
ip address my.wan.ip.54 255.255.255.252
no ip directed-broadcast
encapsulation ppp
no ip route-cache
no ip mroute-cache
no fair-queue
pulse-time 3
!
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 this.one.why.105
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 my.isp.ip.53
no ip http server
!
!
line con 0
password xxxxx
login
transport preferred none
transport input none
line aux 0
password xxxxx
login
line vty 0 4
password xxxxx
login
transport preferred none
!
no scheduler allocate
end

 

[AJ1982]

They are both the same route condition (route any) so may be been an old two link system where 53 was the redundant.

===

Fatman Superstar (Andrew James)

CCNA,
(CCNA Cisco Academy Instructor Trained)

 

[yert33]

Thank you sir. I since have removed the statement and nothing crashed so all must be well.

Thanks again.