Holy Cats!!! No offense to any of the previous people posting, but I have never seen so many people write an incorrect access list line. Pixboy is correct that the "host" keyword negates the need for a mask (and everybody that did write a mask in forgot to use reverse masking), but he forgot the list number. The right example would be:
access-list 101 deny tcp host 192.168.0.1 eq 80
HOWEVER, I have not seen anybody ask a critical question here - you want to block port 80, but in what direction? Are you trying to block this user from accessing outside resources on port 80 (browsing), or are you trying to block the internal resource from using port 80 as a source from the inside (because it is a web server)? If the latter, unless you have a static NAT to this device, nobody from the outside can access its web port anyway. If the former, then the access list would read a bit differently then above:
access-list 101 deny tcp host 192.168.0.1 any eq 80
Hopefully that helps!