Let's say that yesterday was a pretty harrowing one for me as we had 2 of our drives in a Raid 5 array fail over the weekend. These were data drives pertaining to our ERP system. As a result, we had to replace the drives, reinstall SQLServer, and restore full backups from Friday night and apply transaction log backups for any Saturday activity.
After the fact it may have made sense for me to have the master database placed on a different drive than the data because, if I did, SQLServer would still be running and I wouldn't have had to restore the master database or re-install SQLServer. I am wondering if most DBAs place the Master database on a different RAID than the data in order to facilitate recovery? I have Tempdb on a separate drive and my transaction logs on another drive which is recommendd practice. I also assume that if I want to move the master at this point that I simply use the alter database command?
After the fact it may have made sense for me to have the master database placed on a different drive than the data because, if I did, SQLServer would still be running and I wouldn't have had to restore the master database or re-install SQLServer. I am wondering if most DBAs place the Master database on a different RAID than the data in order to facilitate recovery? I have Tempdb on a separate drive and my transaction logs on another drive which is recommendd practice. I also assume that if I want to move the master at this point that I simply use the alter database command?