(1) I am considering a trial test of ocr and flatbed scanning as means of recovering "lost" programs from the printout'ed scripts of those same programs. I need tips on h\w and s\w, brands, prices, etc. - which ones are worth even trying, and which are NOT worth trying, etc.
All these scripts are simple ASCII-coded files (for example, perl scripts) with NO graphics and NO "special characters".
(2) If I chose to "go" with this, after testing it, I would be using a flatbed scanner on my personal Win98 machine, so cost, as well as quality, must be a consideration, for both h\w and s\w. (No "company" is paying for this - it will be me alone.)
(3) I would use the Unix "spell" program, or a Wintel spell checker, as an aid in finding mis-read characters, to speed-up, and increase the accuracy of, the proof reading.
(I have access to Unix, Linux machine which can read floppy disks in Wintel format, to enable use of the of the Unix spell" utility (which has provision to "exclude" programing "words" from the spell-check.)
(4) Any tips, preferences, etc. Thanks.
End-of-memo: Best to you..
from ernieah.
All these scripts are simple ASCII-coded files (for example, perl scripts) with NO graphics and NO "special characters".
(2) If I chose to "go" with this, after testing it, I would be using a flatbed scanner on my personal Win98 machine, so cost, as well as quality, must be a consideration, for both h\w and s\w. (No "company" is paying for this - it will be me alone.)
(3) I would use the Unix "spell" program, or a Wintel spell checker, as an aid in finding mis-read characters, to speed-up, and increase the accuracy of, the proof reading.
(I have access to Unix, Linux machine which can read floppy disks in Wintel format, to enable use of the of the Unix spell" utility (which has provision to "exclude" programing "words" from the spell-check.)
(4) Any tips, preferences, etc. Thanks.
End-of-memo: Best to you..
from ernieah.