absinthium
IS-IT--Management
Hi all,
Has anybody had any luck with these new transceiver modules manufactured by Mertek?
I am getting increasing input error counts with no collisions on my elnk stat.
>ld 137
CIOD000
.stat elnk
ELNK ENABLED
Ethernet (qu unit number 0):
Host: PBX_ELAN
Internet address: 172.17.30.244
Ethernet address: 00:00:75:45:ce:07
Netmask: 0xffff0000; Subnetmask: 0xfffffff8
165 packets received; 165 packets sent
225 input errors; 0 output errors
0 collisions
I am on 11c Rls 23.35.
When I ping it I get maybe 40-50% success rate. It is connected to a Cisco switch and I have played with both setting the port to auto and also hard-setting it to 10/half with no luck.
I have got dipswitch 3 on the NTBK69 up, making it half duplex.
This switch was previously default IP settings which I have subsequently changed, do I need to INI?
Would like to hear what other have found of these new transceiver/cable assemblies.
Thanks
Has anybody had any luck with these new transceiver modules manufactured by Mertek?
I am getting increasing input error counts with no collisions on my elnk stat.
>ld 137
CIOD000
.stat elnk
ELNK ENABLED
Ethernet (qu unit number 0):
Host: PBX_ELAN
Internet address: 172.17.30.244
Ethernet address: 00:00:75:45:ce:07
Netmask: 0xffff0000; Subnetmask: 0xfffffff8
165 packets received; 165 packets sent
225 input errors; 0 output errors
0 collisions
I am on 11c Rls 23.35.
When I ping it I get maybe 40-50% success rate. It is connected to a Cisco switch and I have played with both setting the port to auto and also hard-setting it to 10/half with no luck.
I have got dipswitch 3 on the NTBK69 up, making it half duplex.
This switch was previously default IP settings which I have subsequently changed, do I need to INI?
Would like to hear what other have found of these new transceiver/cable assemblies.
Thanks