Batism by fire...
A customer is adding a location and expanding another. The previous IT guy left and now it is my problem to expand the IP's and subnets. From what I know they have the same IP scheme 10.245.1.x and subnet at main building is a 128 and 240 and the other 2 locations. One offsite location is being expanded and will need a larger IP range, more than the 240 will allow (16 IP's, right?) they need like 25 and expansion room. The new location just needs to be configured and probably a 128 subnet. So here is my question... Instead of trying to redo subnets to keep everyone on the 10.245.1.x scheme and squeeze every available IP addres I can find out without much room for expansion. Can I redo the IP addressing for the remote locations...10.245.2.x, 10.245.3.x, and 10.245.4.x all with .128 subnets. Does this present any issues with routing? The customer uses 506E Pix for the encryption and for the basic routing from what I understand.
Thanks for the help and I'm open to suggestions
A customer is adding a location and expanding another. The previous IT guy left and now it is my problem to expand the IP's and subnets. From what I know they have the same IP scheme 10.245.1.x and subnet at main building is a 128 and 240 and the other 2 locations. One offsite location is being expanded and will need a larger IP range, more than the 240 will allow (16 IP's, right?) they need like 25 and expansion room. The new location just needs to be configured and probably a 128 subnet. So here is my question... Instead of trying to redo subnets to keep everyone on the 10.245.1.x scheme and squeeze every available IP addres I can find out without much room for expansion. Can I redo the IP addressing for the remote locations...10.245.2.x, 10.245.3.x, and 10.245.4.x all with .128 subnets. Does this present any issues with routing? The customer uses 506E Pix for the encryption and for the basic routing from what I understand.
Thanks for the help and I'm open to suggestions