Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations Chriss Miller on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
LAN vs WAN port on IPO
- Thread starter cwhitmore
- Start date
And LAN2 has a Firewall, LAN1 doesn't
___________________________________________
It works! Now if only I could remember what I did...
Dain Bramaged (Avaya Search tool )
______________________________________
___________________________________________
It works! Now if only I could remember what I did...
Dain Bramaged (Avaya Search tool )
______________________________________
tlpeter
I'm just doing that thing you mencioned: "The second lan port can be used for sip trunks or putting the IPO in the customer network when it has it;s own network"
How can I do that?
I have my 172.70.70.x for voice and 192.168.3.x for data, but with voicemail pro and contact store in same segment as voice and I need internet to send recordings to email. How can I reach the data segment through the WAN?
With a router rule, if I put in 192.168.3.x I can ping 172, but not viceversa.
Thnks in advane
I'm just doing that thing you mencioned: "The second lan port can be used for sip trunks or putting the IPO in the customer network when it has it;s own network"
How can I do that?
I have my 172.70.70.x for voice and 192.168.3.x for data, but with voicemail pro and contact store in same segment as voice and I need internet to send recordings to email. How can I reach the data segment through the WAN?
With a router rule, if I put in 192.168.3.x I can ping 172, but not viceversa.
Thnks in advane
amriddle01
Programmer
The ip address enteres is outside od the destination LAN subnet range" that only shows when you enter a gateway on a different subnet to the systems LAN port 
amriddle01
Programmer
What is the IP of the system and what is the IP of the gateway you are trying to use?
amriddle01
Programmer
Peter's route of:
0.0.0.0
0.0.0.0
192.168.3.xxx
Lan 2
Will only work if the systms LAN2 port has a 192.168.3.x address, I imagine it doesn't which is why you are getting the error. That's why we need to know what the IP's of the systems ports are and what the gateways address is on the two subnets
0.0.0.0
0.0.0.0
192.168.3.xxx
Lan 2
Will only work if the systms LAN2 port has a 192.168.3.x address, I imagine it doesn't which is why you are getting the error. That's why we need to know what the IP's of the systems ports are and what the gateways address is on the two subnets
amriddle01
Programmer
If that was the case they wouldn't be the error about the gateway, just because someone has decided that those are the vlan's doesn't mean all the programming required to make it happen has also been done, I always assume not hence the question about addresses
amriddle01
Programmer
This route "192.168.3.0
255.255.255.0
192.168.3.xxx where xxx is the default gateway.
Lan 2"
Is also wrong/not required as the system does not need a route for local traffic
255.255.255.0
192.168.3.xxx where xxx is the default gateway.
Lan 2"
Is also wrong/not required as the system does not need a route for local traffic
amriddle01
Programmer
I'm really sorry. The error disappear, I totally forgot the lan2 ip.
Now, I think my error is in gateway address.
Lan 1: 172.70.70.5
mask: /24
gateway: 0.0.0.0
lan 2: 192.168.3.55
mask: /24
gateway: 192.168.1.254
ip route: ip: 0.0.0.0
mask: 0.0.0.0
gateway: 192.168.3.254
lan 2
Now, I think my error is in gateway address.
Lan 1: 172.70.70.5
mask: /24
gateway: 0.0.0.0
lan 2: 192.168.3.55
mask: /24
gateway: 192.168.1.254
ip route: ip: 0.0.0.0
mask: 0.0.0.0
gateway: 192.168.3.254
lan 2
- Status
Similar threads
