Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations bkrike on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Jet engine obsolete? I don't agree!

Status
Not open for further replies.

tommetje

Programmer
Oct 1, 2005
1
NL
It's a shame that Microsoft has put Jet into obsolescense in favor of MSDE which is a memory hog and a nightmare to install. MSDE is a 70 meg. package with only the server component and no sufficient client-software. Installing under Windows XP sp2 is a worse nightmare because of security problems, aaarrgh! It's installer is a really bad one, since it's worse than DOS installers, because it only works correctly if the input at the commandline is meaningful. A dialog based installer is expected and the installer is a visiting card of the application. If this is already poor, then I think the application might be poor too. MSDE isn't poor at all, but the installer is. :-(

I plea for a new Jet engine!

There are some ways to realise this:

Microsoft could put Jet into open-source, so the community can correct and/or extend the engine. The following things should then be possible:

1: Written udf functions within Access could then be available to ANY program, including .NET apps.
2: Define stored procedures and triggers by calling udf functions.
3: SQL mode udf, stored procedures (not only querydefs!!) and triggers.

Microsoft could create a new proprietary JetV (version 5) engine written in .NET, so the VBA bulk gets out of there. I find .NET much cleaner to read than unmanager C++. Native C++ can lead to numerous hard to find stinging bugs whilst .NET alerts the program with understandable exception messages. .NET rules!

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top