CCIEWANNABE,
"..there are plenty of login buffer overflow viruses.."
ahem,,a buffer overflow would be an attack on a deficient
boundary check in the login binaries' code, not a virus per-se.
A virus could be written to take advantage of this vector of course, but it would more usefully be a trojan of some
sort.
"..many different intruder viruses that consume memory and
processor time.."
All running binaries use these resources..what's your point? I don't see any reference to a virus that specifically utilizes "..cache memory of the router.."
for this purpose, or even if resident in "cache memory"
one that would have more than local significance.
Is this FUD or are you actually in possession of some
reportable facts?
Benzito,
How is a router, that is running binaries of a totally
different variety than your average winhost, going to
be the contaminated vector for virus propagation?
It is difficult to write multiplatform viruses;
say one that understands ELF and win32 binaries alike.
So:
What makes everyone believe that an IOS specific virus
can do any harm to a windows machine or vice versa, except
indirectly through bandwidth suffocation in the case of a
network aware or scanning worm like nimda, code red?