hi, ive gotten alot further in the last couple days searching on these forums but ive reached another stumbling block.
ive created the policy-maps to mark packets as they come in on their respective wan interface and it appearsto be working:
4500M#sho policy-map interface ethernet 0
Ethernet0
Service-policy input: isp1
Class-map: isp1 (match-all)
836098 packets, 60580496 bytes
5 minute offered rate 86000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: any
QoS Set
precedence 5
Packets marked 836098
so i mark the packets with a precedence 5
i then have a route-map for outgoing packets to route based on the precedence value.
access-list 110 permit tcp any any precedence critical
access-list 110 permit udp any any precedence critical
route-map outgoing permit 10
match ip address 110
set ip next-hop b.c.d.e
and of course on my interface i have:
ip policy route-map outgoing.
so by my thinking any packets that come back into the router on eth4 shere the route-policy is defined should be routed to the set next hop.
but it is not the case:
4500M#sho route-map
route-map outgoing, permit, sequence 10
Match clauses:
ip address (access-lists): 110
Set clauses:
ip next-hop b.c.d.e
Policy routing matches: 666 packets, 149822 bytes
route-map outgoing, permit, sequence 20
Match clauses:
ip address (access-lists): 111
Set clauses:
ip next-hop 192.168.254.254
Policy routing matches: 526 packets, 80799 bytes
as you can see it has caught some packets... but 666 packets in 12 hours is not even 1% when 836098 packets have been marked incoming in the last 3 hours or so.
does anybody have any thoughts as to what i might be missing?
i can post more config if required.
thanks
ive created the policy-maps to mark packets as they come in on their respective wan interface and it appearsto be working:
4500M#sho policy-map interface ethernet 0
Ethernet0
Service-policy input: isp1
Class-map: isp1 (match-all)
836098 packets, 60580496 bytes
5 minute offered rate 86000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: any
QoS Set
precedence 5
Packets marked 836098
so i mark the packets with a precedence 5
i then have a route-map for outgoing packets to route based on the precedence value.
access-list 110 permit tcp any any precedence critical
access-list 110 permit udp any any precedence critical
route-map outgoing permit 10
match ip address 110
set ip next-hop b.c.d.e
and of course on my interface i have:
ip policy route-map outgoing.
so by my thinking any packets that come back into the router on eth4 shere the route-policy is defined should be routed to the set next hop.
but it is not the case:
4500M#sho route-map
route-map outgoing, permit, sequence 10
Match clauses:
ip address (access-lists): 110
Set clauses:
ip next-hop b.c.d.e
Policy routing matches: 666 packets, 149822 bytes
route-map outgoing, permit, sequence 20
Match clauses:
ip address (access-lists): 111
Set clauses:
ip next-hop 192.168.254.254
Policy routing matches: 526 packets, 80799 bytes
as you can see it has caught some packets... but 666 packets in 12 hours is not even 1% when 836098 packets have been marked incoming in the last 3 hours or so.
does anybody have any thoughts as to what i might be missing?
i can post more config if required.
thanks