I have a group of reports I'm converting from CR 8.0 to web CR.NET. All the reports but one convert and run from my machine as localhost and when copied to our server. One report works on my machine, but gives an "invalid field name" error when run from the server.
This report is slow (15 seconds for a supervisor, 2 minutes for site). It has 3 subreports and takes one of three possible parameters (worker, supervisor, site) plus start and end dates. I'm passing information to the aspx page in the query string and supplying null values for the two unused parameters:
...runreport.aspx?reportname=thisreport&site_cd=QUEENS&mgr_key=null&wkr_key=null&start_dt=06/01/2004&end_dt= 06/30/2004
With the report on my development machine and the server, I can literally edit the querystring changing localhost to servername. It runs from localhost, not from the server. Some threads here suggest there might be problems with date parameters. I've been removing things one at a time. I will try to hardcode the dates tomorrow, but I don't understand why one report would work in one environment and not the other when supplying it exactly the same information.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Bob Hagan
This report is slow (15 seconds for a supervisor, 2 minutes for site). It has 3 subreports and takes one of three possible parameters (worker, supervisor, site) plus start and end dates. I'm passing information to the aspx page in the query string and supplying null values for the two unused parameters:
...runreport.aspx?reportname=thisreport&site_cd=QUEENS&mgr_key=null&wkr_key=null&start_dt=06/01/2004&end_dt= 06/30/2004
With the report on my development machine and the server, I can literally edit the querystring changing localhost to servername. It runs from localhost, not from the server. Some threads here suggest there might be problems with date parameters. I've been removing things one at a time. I will try to hardcode the dates tomorrow, but I don't understand why one report would work in one environment and not the other when supplying it exactly the same information.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Bob Hagan