Hierarchial Grouping

[crystal82]

Hi,

Currently, I have a report grouped by job name (which is split into 3 GF1 sections with conditional suppression so that:
GF1a – displays all job names in level 2
GF1b– displays all job names in level 3
GF1c – displays all job names in level 4

However, I want the groups to display hierarchically in the following format:
Job Name (100) @ Level 2
Job Name (101) @ Level 3
Job Name (102) @ Level 4

Job Name (200) @ Level 2
Job Name (201) @ Level 3
Job Name (202) @ Level 4

This means that the job level needs to sit underneath the Job Name group. However, I have my job name running totals in GF1a,GF1b, and GF1c so I cant move all of this information up to GH1 and have a job level group sitting underneath Group 1 because the running totals are then evaluated incorrectly.

Is there a way around this?

 

[lbass]

This is hard to follow when you use abstract field names (job name) instead of sample data. Could you translate the above into some sample data?

-LB