brackovic
IS-IT--Management
- May 13, 2004
- 50
Customer has Ultirum2 drives and uses 200/400 GB tapes.
In the NW configuration he has several file system backup groups of clients and one group for Oracle backup.
Version of NW is 7.1.6 and version of NMO is 4.0.
Tapes from Oracle pool have average fullness of about 320 GB, while tapes from file systems’ pools have average fullness of about 115 GB.
We tried a few things:
- We have increased number of streams to tape, so all created savesets from clients in one file system group can be written at same time on the tape.
- We have included and excluded and again included standard directive with compression.
The result was the same: file system tape has been fulfilled up to 120 GB maximum, while Oracle tapes have been fulfilled normally up to 350 GB.
Does someone have some explanation and suggestion for this issue??
S
In the NW configuration he has several file system backup groups of clients and one group for Oracle backup.
Version of NW is 7.1.6 and version of NMO is 4.0.
Tapes from Oracle pool have average fullness of about 320 GB, while tapes from file systems’ pools have average fullness of about 115 GB.
We tried a few things:
- We have increased number of streams to tape, so all created savesets from clients in one file system group can be written at same time on the tape.
- We have included and excluded and again included standard directive with compression.
The result was the same: file system tape has been fulfilled up to 120 GB maximum, while Oracle tapes have been fulfilled normally up to 350 GB.
Does someone have some explanation and suggestion for this issue??
S