>>but it would have been a nice feature<<
You see, that's where Quark went wrong. They spent so long dicking around trying to make it be a web authoring tool as well as a page layout tool, they missed the boat with OSX and allowed ID to get streets ahead. Personally I am very pleased that Adobe were sensible and kept ID for making pages not websites. There are plenty of other programs out there far better suited e.g. Dreamweaver, GoLive and even FrontPage. But if you want to be a purist and create it in your own HTML, why on earth would you be looking at ID anyway?