I'm trying to setup a Exchange 2010 and use NAT on my network. It appears that in 2010 I need two seperate SSL certs, one for the public address and one for the private address. Is this the case?
What I typically do is buy a multi-name cert from either Digicert (service) or GoDaddy (price) and put these names in it:
mail.domain.com (external FQDN people will use for activesync/owa)
autodiscover.domain.com
server.domain.local (internal FQDN)
server (internal netbios)
Make sure that the name you are going to use for external connections like Outlook Anywhere is the "common name" on the cert, usually the first name you list when you populate fields for cert names.
If you pay the same price for five names as four, add another name in there like mail2.domain.com so that if you ever need to stand up another server or do some testing, you can use the same certificate for that server without having to buy another one.
I generally do just the OWA name, such as mail.domain.com, and the autodiscover name, autodiscover.domain.com. I prefer not to expose internal server names in the cert, and with split-brain DNS, it's not needed.
My MX records will generally point to the same external IP address as the OWA name, so the mail.domain.com will be used for SMTP, including TLS.
Pat RichardMVP Plan for performance, and capacity takes care of itself. Plan for capacity, and suffer poor performance.
True, Pat. My summary doesn't apply to a split-brain environment, only to one with a private DNS suffix.
There are some significant benefits to using the same domain name internally and externally, but you have to "get" DNS to be able to set that up properly.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.