I have personally found that a good VAR is 1,000 times better than Macola support directly for a couple of reasons.
Even though consultants of any kind do cost you, Macola direct support will cost you more.
Macola direct support does not have the personal contact with your business that a good VAR will.
VAR's that are good at what they do can "think outside the box" and offer alternative solutions. Macola does not think outside the pre-programmed Macola world.
If a problem exist that a VAR can not solve then they have alternatives. Speak with another VAR, other company experiences, other users, and even calling Macola Support.
Macola support relies soley on their internal support and has never (to my knowledge) gone outside their own support cycle to solve a problem.
I have personally been able to implement with either My VAR or other consultants, solutions that Macola advised "could not be done". Granted these solutions involved outside programming, flex programming, SQL procedures, user tables, etc, but Macola will never recommend those types of solutions,
These statements are my personal experience as both an end user, Macola consultant, and end user manager. Macola may be changing their thought processes, but I have seen no personal evidence of that.
Just my $.02
Andy Baldwin
"Testing is the most overlooked programming language on the books!"
Ask a great question, get a great answer. Ask a vague question, get a vague answer.
Find out how to get great answers FAQ219-2884.