Hi,
I'm currently doing a review of our backup software and wanted to know if anyone acutally has a comparison of version 9.0's software to whats offered/changed/improved in version 11D (or whatever the lastest version is).
Management needs convincing that the upgrade is worth the cost of upgrading. My job is to tell them how we aren't completely protected...
We currently run 1 windows 2000 advanced server, 1 linux server and the rest of 3 servers are Windows 2003 or higher.
We currently have in place:
Backup Exec 9.0 (4367)
SQL Server Agent (backing up SQL 2000)
Exchange Agent (protecting an exchange 2003 server)
IDR agent (not sure if this is even working now.
Unix/Linux Agent (agent.be for protecting our Linux server).
4 x Backup Exec Server Agents
Any insights would be appreciated. Also if anyone knows of any reasons not to go to 11D as well.
Thanks
Kevin.
I'm currently doing a review of our backup software and wanted to know if anyone acutally has a comparison of version 9.0's software to whats offered/changed/improved in version 11D (or whatever the lastest version is).
Management needs convincing that the upgrade is worth the cost of upgrading. My job is to tell them how we aren't completely protected...
We currently run 1 windows 2000 advanced server, 1 linux server and the rest of 3 servers are Windows 2003 or higher.
We currently have in place:
Backup Exec 9.0 (4367)
SQL Server Agent (backing up SQL 2000)
Exchange Agent (protecting an exchange 2003 server)
IDR agent (not sure if this is even working now.
Unix/Linux Agent (agent.be for protecting our Linux server).
4 x Backup Exec Server Agents
Any insights would be appreciated. Also if anyone knows of any reasons not to go to 11D as well.
Thanks
Kevin.