Hi all,
We run a lab at our organization to test software we develop against common configurations of machines used within the organization. Currently, for the Windows side, this is fairly easy: We have a lone Win2K box, a couple XP Home boxes, several XP Pro boxes, and a couple new Vista machines. We keep a few images of each machine. With the XP boxes, there are SP1 and SP2 images, both clean and with older versions of our software installed.
However, with Vista slowly being adopted by our users, we run into a conundrum: There are 4 versions of Vista that our users will realistically be running. Once SP1 comes out, it is going to create a testing environment that will become rather untenable to maintain. That ends up being 16 images per machine. Is there an easier way? I would rather avoid keeping 16 images patched on each of a bunch of different machines from a bunch of different manufacturers.
Do you guys have any ideas? Is anyone else in a similar scenario?
Thanks!
-gmiles
We run a lab at our organization to test software we develop against common configurations of machines used within the organization. Currently, for the Windows side, this is fairly easy: We have a lone Win2K box, a couple XP Home boxes, several XP Pro boxes, and a couple new Vista machines. We keep a few images of each machine. With the XP boxes, there are SP1 and SP2 images, both clean and with older versions of our software installed.
However, with Vista slowly being adopted by our users, we run into a conundrum: There are 4 versions of Vista that our users will realistically be running. Once SP1 comes out, it is going to create a testing environment that will become rather untenable to maintain. That ends up being 16 images per machine. Is there an easier way? I would rather avoid keeping 16 images patched on each of a bunch of different machines from a bunch of different manufacturers.
Do you guys have any ideas? Is anyone else in a similar scenario?
Thanks!
-gmiles