Hi,
Have an issue thats really baffling me. After some office moves we had some ports in err-disabled state(dot1x-security-violation err-disabled, we have no port security enabled ).
I naturally shut and no shut the interface which would come up and then disabled itself again(within seconds) . Looking at the dot1x stats/logs, the port authenticates ok, but then goes down because a NEW mac appears at the end of that port!!! However there is only one workstation plugged in directly.
Interestingly enough, If I change the dot1x settings on that port to a perm authorized state and re-enable the port, it comes up fine as expected, however looking at the mac table for that port, there are TWO macs. One dynamic ( learnt as switches do ) and another thats a static entry!!! but... there are no static macs configured on the switch.
I have gone through the config and there is definatly no static macs set and I cannot remove them from the mac table. This is really looking buggy to me, however I was wondering if anyone had experienced this before.
Thanks, Lee.
LEEroy
MCNE6,CCNP,CWNA,CCSA,Project+
Have an issue thats really baffling me. After some office moves we had some ports in err-disabled state(dot1x-security-violation err-disabled, we have no port security enabled ).
I naturally shut and no shut the interface which would come up and then disabled itself again(within seconds) . Looking at the dot1x stats/logs, the port authenticates ok, but then goes down because a NEW mac appears at the end of that port!!! However there is only one workstation plugged in directly.
Interestingly enough, If I change the dot1x settings on that port to a perm authorized state and re-enable the port, it comes up fine as expected, however looking at the mac table for that port, there are TWO macs. One dynamic ( learnt as switches do ) and another thats a static entry!!! but... there are no static macs configured on the switch.
I have gone through the config and there is definatly no static macs set and I cannot remove them from the mac table. This is really looking buggy to me, however I was wondering if anyone had experienced this before.
Thanks, Lee.
LEEroy
MCNE6,CCNP,CWNA,CCSA,Project+