Hi ,
I just noticed this and am not comfortable with this:
I analyze my tables and indexes daily. AS such , all the necessary details should be populated in the statistics tables such as user_tables, all_indexes etc etc. Well , some indexes seem to have this funny problem -> although their base table has well over 400,000 rows , the all_indexes tables has a '0' in the 'num_rows' column(FYI - the cardinality of this column is quite high). Now a similar problem is seen for some of the tables..infact , one of my tables which has >433,000 rows has '0' populated in the num_rows column though it is analyzed everyday. IS there a problem at hand .... or is there some logical explanation for the same?(FYI again -> i do compute statistics for all of them)
Regards,
S. Jayaram Uparna .
If the need arises,you are welcome to mail me at upparna@yahoo.com .
I just noticed this and am not comfortable with this:
I analyze my tables and indexes daily. AS such , all the necessary details should be populated in the statistics tables such as user_tables, all_indexes etc etc. Well , some indexes seem to have this funny problem -> although their base table has well over 400,000 rows , the all_indexes tables has a '0' in the 'num_rows' column(FYI - the cardinality of this column is quite high). Now a similar problem is seen for some of the tables..infact , one of my tables which has >433,000 rows has '0' populated in the num_rows column though it is analyzed everyday. IS there a problem at hand .... or is there some logical explanation for the same?(FYI again -> i do compute statistics for all of them)
Regards,
S. Jayaram Uparna .
If the need arises,you are welcome to mail me at upparna@yahoo.com .