I have written most of the easy ASP portion for a MS Access
DB insert. In the database, I have about 15 checkboxes in it. Five
of them represent a point total of 1 point, 5 of them at 2 points each
and 5 at 4 points each. Over time this database will get quite big.
In the database, I will most likely need a field that will represent
the point value of all 15 checkbox fields or I'll just have to use a
formula in all future reports, modify asp's and query asp's to
calculate the 15 checkboxes.
Anyway, can someone suggest which direction I should take (Total Point
Value field in the database or not). The problem that I worried about
with making a Total Point Value field is the formulas processing the
correct point total when the modify.asp changes some or all of the
checkbox values. The problem I have without the field is that future
yearly and monthly reports would be needed and I don't want the report
to be too slow since it will have to process at least 15 checkbox
fields for each record multiplied by tens of thousands of records in
the future.
Any thoughts? TIA
DB insert. In the database, I have about 15 checkboxes in it. Five
of them represent a point total of 1 point, 5 of them at 2 points each
and 5 at 4 points each. Over time this database will get quite big.
In the database, I will most likely need a field that will represent
the point value of all 15 checkbox fields or I'll just have to use a
formula in all future reports, modify asp's and query asp's to
calculate the 15 checkboxes.
Anyway, can someone suggest which direction I should take (Total Point
Value field in the database or not). The problem that I worried about
with making a Total Point Value field is the formulas processing the
correct point total when the modify.asp changes some or all of the
checkbox values. The problem I have without the field is that future
yearly and monthly reports would be needed and I don't want the report
to be too slow since it will have to process at least 15 checkbox
fields for each record multiplied by tens of thousands of records in
the future.
Any thoughts? TIA