Dear All,
I was wondering whether anyone could shed some light into something.
We are trying to merge two Windows 2000 networks which have AD running. The plan was initially to break one network up and join it to the existing one, new tree in forest configuration.
This would give us:
a) Logon capability at either site via the domain logon dropdown in teh logon screen
b) Email synchronisation and address list configuration
c) Automatic trusts relationships
However, we noticed that it is possible to use Active Directory Domains and Trusts and add the other domain in the trust (making some entries to the LMHOST). When successful, we find that this also allows people to logon from either domain to their respective account. This process means that we save a lot of time since we didn't have to break down one AD domain.
I wondered whether anyone knows the disadvantages of doing the integration this way. Are there any major flaws in this approach? From what we've seen, it looks like an easier way to link in the networks. We can also assign rights to folder and files for users of the other domain via the drop down.
Thanks for your time
I was wondering whether anyone could shed some light into something.
We are trying to merge two Windows 2000 networks which have AD running. The plan was initially to break one network up and join it to the existing one, new tree in forest configuration.
This would give us:
a) Logon capability at either site via the domain logon dropdown in teh logon screen
b) Email synchronisation and address list configuration
c) Automatic trusts relationships
However, we noticed that it is possible to use Active Directory Domains and Trusts and add the other domain in the trust (making some entries to the LMHOST). When successful, we find that this also allows people to logon from either domain to their respective account. This process means that we save a lot of time since we didn't have to break down one AD domain.
I wondered whether anyone knows the disadvantages of doing the integration this way. Are there any major flaws in this approach? From what we've seen, it looks like an easier way to link in the networks. We can also assign rights to folder and files for users of the other domain via the drop down.
Thanks for your time