petermeachem
Programmer
My front end is Access 97 and the backend is SQL Server 7.
The user enters a date and a coupe of other things and the form displays a list of editable records. I currently have attached tables and am doing me.recordsource = "SELECT etc".
This works fine, but I am informed could be improved if the query was run on the server. I know how to write a script on the server with parameters. The problem is I can't figure out how to persuade the Access form to take any notice of it.
a) Is this worth doing from a performance point of view?
b) How do I do it?
I have SQL on a very slow old pc here and the customer has a stonkingly fast Compaq, but as far as I can see the rate that the Access form updates is much the same in both cases. This means I suppose that either the network, or Access is causing a bottleneck. As far as I can see, only about 60kb is being read across the network per query, so it looks like Access.
Any help appreciated!
The user enters a date and a coupe of other things and the form displays a list of editable records. I currently have attached tables and am doing me.recordsource = "SELECT etc".
This works fine, but I am informed could be improved if the query was run on the server. I know how to write a script on the server with parameters. The problem is I can't figure out how to persuade the Access form to take any notice of it.
a) Is this worth doing from a performance point of view?
b) How do I do it?
I have SQL on a very slow old pc here and the customer has a stonkingly fast Compaq, but as far as I can see the rate that the Access form updates is much the same in both cases. This means I suppose that either the network, or Access is causing a bottleneck. As far as I can see, only about 60kb is being read across the network per query, so it looks like Access.
Any help appreciated!