Where to start...here's my topology...
pc---Cat2924XL---2620-----2620XM---AT&T_adsl_MODEM---internet
PC gets IP via dhcp from 2620. The 2620 is connected to the 2620XM via two "bonded" asynch serial interfaces. The 2620XM fa0/0 gets IP from the MODEM via DHCP.
I can ping from the pc through everything to the fa0/0 interface of the 2620XM. The ip address of fa0/0 on the 2620XM is 192.168.1.64/16, and the ip address of the ethernet interface on the modem is 192.168.0.1/16. The modem does NAT. I can ping 192.168.0.1 from fa0/0 of the 2620XM, which is evident also of the fact that it got the ip address from 192.168.0.1. However, I cannot ping 192.168.0.1 from anything else---remember, I can ping 192.168.1.64, which is fa0/0 of the 2620XM, and it is directly connected to 192.168.0.1. I have configured eigrp on the two routers, and on the 2620XM, I put in 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 in one of the network statements. The sh ip route from the 2620 shows that 192.168.0.0/16 can be reached via the virtual access (loopback) of the 2620XM. Does the supernet mask for 192.168.0.0 kinda screw things up??? I am at a loss on this one.
One more thing to note...I tried to configure the modem to "share" the public IP address with fa0/0, which gave it a class B public IP---this just made things worse for my poor routers, because the modem still had its 192.168.0.1, which was connected to fa0/0!!! HELP!!!
Burt
pc---Cat2924XL---2620-----2620XM---AT&T_adsl_MODEM---internet
PC gets IP via dhcp from 2620. The 2620 is connected to the 2620XM via two "bonded" asynch serial interfaces. The 2620XM fa0/0 gets IP from the MODEM via DHCP.
I can ping from the pc through everything to the fa0/0 interface of the 2620XM. The ip address of fa0/0 on the 2620XM is 192.168.1.64/16, and the ip address of the ethernet interface on the modem is 192.168.0.1/16. The modem does NAT. I can ping 192.168.0.1 from fa0/0 of the 2620XM, which is evident also of the fact that it got the ip address from 192.168.0.1. However, I cannot ping 192.168.0.1 from anything else---remember, I can ping 192.168.1.64, which is fa0/0 of the 2620XM, and it is directly connected to 192.168.0.1. I have configured eigrp on the two routers, and on the 2620XM, I put in 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 in one of the network statements. The sh ip route from the 2620 shows that 192.168.0.0/16 can be reached via the virtual access (loopback) of the 2620XM. Does the supernet mask for 192.168.0.0 kinda screw things up??? I am at a loss on this one.
One more thing to note...I tried to configure the modem to "share" the public IP address with fa0/0, which gave it a class B public IP---this just made things worse for my poor routers, because the modem still had its 192.168.0.1, which was connected to fa0/0!!! HELP!!!
Burt