What is optimal for 2 related unv's: 1 huge DB or 2 DB's with redundant data?
We are running BO in 3-Tiers with Oracle 9.
Universe 1: Large Unv. file (460 Kb, 900 objects) uses 68 GB database. Currently in use with adequate performance.
Universe 2: Universe not yet designed, about one-third common objects with universe 1. DB is 20 GB.
There will be probably be some reports that will need data from both, but for the most part, users will use one universe or the other.
Is there any advantage or disadvantage to putting all the data in one database? One Oracle instance? One server?
I assume that queries that link the universes will run a little faster if both DB's are on the same server (due to network traffic) as long as the HW can handle it.
Besides performance, there is the issue of redundant data and data integrity. What do you think the trade-offs are?
Thanks for any comments or suggestions.
Dave
We are running BO in 3-Tiers with Oracle 9.
Universe 1: Large Unv. file (460 Kb, 900 objects) uses 68 GB database. Currently in use with adequate performance.
Universe 2: Universe not yet designed, about one-third common objects with universe 1. DB is 20 GB.
There will be probably be some reports that will need data from both, but for the most part, users will use one universe or the other.
Is there any advantage or disadvantage to putting all the data in one database? One Oracle instance? One server?
I assume that queries that link the universes will run a little faster if both DB's are on the same server (due to network traffic) as long as the HW can handle it.
Besides performance, there is the issue of redundant data and data integrity. What do you think the trade-offs are?
Thanks for any comments or suggestions.
Dave