Search results for query: *

Thanks for the replies. I cracked the case open and this may have been a factory refurb. It has an Avaya refurb label inside with Dec ‘01 date. S/N label on processor board starts with 01SP, ends with REFB and is different than the S/N on the module case label that I got that comcode...

I am trying to find some information regarding the ACS 308 hardware versions 103Gxx, primarily what the numbers after the G designate to help make a decision or two. At one time I had a matrix that had info for 103G and 103E revs, when they were released and the updates/changes for these...

Sorry it took so long to post, I got busy... The backup and restore of ACS R6 works properly with the 12G1 card. I have tried it several times with no issue. Avaya says the only real diff in the cards is the upgrade firmware supplied in them. He said the intent was for the ACS processor R3-R6...

It will downgrade a R6 to R3, I can confirm that mine was running at R6.0 (it is R6 hardware also) and is now running at R3.03...much to my dismay...and the programming did not survive the downgrade but it appears migration of configurations is supported in upgrades. The features specific to R6...

Thanks Westi. I will let you know if the backup with R6 works on the 12G1 card. I've discovered that I may have access to Avaya factory contact so that could help things work out OK. aarenot..Great 'encouraging words' but warranty is not an issue. This was a used processor when I got it and...

Hi I recently got an ACS R6 processor and had it working fine. Simple configuration but I need to backup the config and have no card. I thought remote access, PC access would be a good thing too so I purchased a 108319963 12G1 Remote Access, Upgrade, Backup/restore card for $20. It was supposed...

djteck2k Got a FVM318 and it works fine with the Safenet remote ver9 software I mentioned before although that software does not support the AES encryption. Also the FVM that I got has a coupon to buy SoftremoteLT for $99 US. Some people have been successful with the Netscreen client. I have...

DaveVVV The VPN client software installs a virtual network interface and when the VPN is active ALL traffic is routed through it if split tunneling is not allowed no matter if you have a multi homed configuration. The virtual interface is issued an IP address by the VPN gateway and acts as the...

Raptorz, Haven't tried remote client behind a NAT device but if the NAT device supports IPSec passthru it should work. Gotta try this type of config with an app that I am massaging to work with IPSec VPN client software interfaces at work and will post what I find regarding this. ALLTOOLS, et...

This has become a widespread policy...particularly if your IT dept has IBM or AT&T folks in it or maybe outsourced to them. They, as a rule do not allow 'split tunneling' or 'split routing' and this is enforced by policies on the Nortel gateway/switch. It is good security policy however...

Check the FVS318 and W2K thread in the VPN forum for a posting of the version 9 Safenet client when they gave it away for personal use. It works with the FVS318 and should with the FVM as the settings are identical although I have not had the courage to spend the money on the faster...

DezUK Saw the same symptom of Phase 2 failing. Had to set the LocalIdentifier in the FVS to an IP (also used 0.0.0.0 at first) and tried my FQDN (dyndns type) which also worked. It seems that in the Remote Party Identity and addressing config of SoftRemote v9 if you set the type to any it opens...

govcon, Thanks for the reply. I have reverted to the safenet v9 client and successfully created a tunnel with the same results as the Win2K/WinXPPro config...only being able to ping the router LAN address. Due to the fact that this is a dialup connection and the IPAddress changes (sometimes...

Maybe somebody has seen symptoms similar to this Configured the XP Pro client policies and got a IPSec tunnel going (see logs) Sat, 09/27/2003 22:36:31 - TAGWY01 IPsec:Receive Packet address:0x1807194 from 67.74.169.228 Sat, 09/27/2003 22:36:31 - TAGWY01 IPsec:New State index:1, sno:4 Sat...

Yes, ver 4_15.03 has the same exact symptoms and log entries. Have you any experience with this config? The nortel client is somewhat limited in that it is only allows Username/Password authentication or Group ID/PW authentication with no other parameters configurable (or at least the copy...

Anybody have any luck with this combination? Need to use the Nortel client (v02.06.33) because of work issues. It works fine with the Nortel switch. Attempts to connect to the FVS318 produce following in Netgear logs: Wed, 09/24/2003 23:15:28 - TAGWY01 IPsec:Receive Packet address:0x1807194...