WooHoo!! It worked great! Thanks for your help! Now I'll try the "Find Unmatched Query" to get my differences between this result set and the reference table Data Points.
Thanks again.
Certainly (using your example above):
User1 User2 User3 User4
abc def ghi jkl
mno pqr stu vwx
Result desired:
AllUsers
abc
def
ghi
jkl
mno
pgr
stu
vwx
Does that explain it better?
Ok, the "+" did not work at all and the "&" simply concatenated all the fields in each record into one record. What I need is for each field in each record of the original table to be a distinct (omit duplicates), separate record in one column. Does that make sense?
I'm not sure how to...
BTW, the SQL code I posted above was generated by Access - so I am wondering why it chose the "Requirements.RQ_User1, Requirements.RQ_User2..." type of statement instead of "RQ_User1, RQ_User2...." type?
Things that make you go "Hmm...
Thank you all for your posts - I will try them out to see which one works best for my needs. As far as normalization: you're right - the price of being an only-touch-Access-once-in-a-blue-moon kind of user (and not coming from a programming background).
Nonetheless, I REALLY appreciate these...
This CAN'T be that tough!!!!
I have a query that looks at a table and tells me which records have data in any of 8 fields (SQL code below):
SELECT Requirements.RQ_User1, Requirements.RQ_User2, Requirements.RQ_User3, Requirements.RQ_User4, Requirements.RQ_User5, Requirements.RQ_User6...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.