Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations Chriss Miller on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. ProGrape

    Evaluating Arithmetic Operators within Backticks

    That would make sense. If anyone is interested, I wrote a few est scripts to analyse the behaviour of the do command. What was needed what the useage of my($i,$j,$k) instead of simply ($i,$j,$k). do and backticks do not work in exactly the same way... the calling instance of p continues to use...
  2. ProGrape

    Evaluating Arithmetic Operators within Backticks

    travs & brigmar, thanks for the suggestions. Yes I see what you mean about asking the shell to do the calculations, I hadn't really understood that before. And brigmar, that is what I had done (it works), but it results in longer code :P Miller, Wow! Even though your second improvement doesn't...
  3. ProGrape

    Evaluating Arithmetic Operators within Backticks

    Hm, I have already acknowledged that I am writing the code poorly. That was not my question, and in general I use good programming practices. I can see instances where having operators evaluated properly inside backticks would be useful and convenient even if I were not trying to minimise the...
  4. ProGrape

    Evaluating Arithmetic Operators within Backticks

    Hello. I am relatively new to perl, and I am having a problem involving the evaluation of arithmetic operators enclosed in backticks. From within my perl program, I call another perl program, using the following lines of code: @n=@ARGV; map system("perl other.pl ".($n[0]-$_)." ".($n[1]-1)."...

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top