Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations wOOdy-Soft on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  • Users: IfAtFirst
  • Content: Threads
  • Order by date
  1. IfAtFirst

    Nonsense! You cannot talk to your VPN children?

    It's true. When doing router-to-router VPNs, like Linksys (BEF)SX41s and VP41s, you cannot talk to someone with the same DNA (IP address on the same segment) through a tunnel. You must use distinctly different segments at each end, or a packet in the tunnel doesn't know which way to turn...
  2. IfAtFirst

    Virtual Address - Little Black Book?

    or red book? Is there any documentation or experiences with virtual addresses working? They are supposed to be able to land you on the same LAN segment - 192.168.1.114 should be able to gain access to 192.168.1.0, when things go right. But they don't. When targeting a Linksys BEFVP41...
  3. IfAtFirst

    Who has a successful "Virtual" VPN address?

    Virtual addresses for Sentinel/SoftRemote clients are purportedly able to get you onto the same LAN segment as that implied by the virtual address. E.g., my target is a faraway segment: 192.168.1.0 (with LAN gateway at 192.168.1.50). I set my virtual address at 192.168.1.114 and these software...
  4. IfAtFirst

    Virtual Adaptor hardly there

    I experienced this problem on SSH-Sentinel, and then upgraded to its commercial successor - SafeNet's SoftRemote - but continue to be virtually shut out of my target LAN. Target LAN is accessed by Linksys (BEF)VP-41, with static IP address on the Net. Subnet there is 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0...

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top