It's true. When doing router-to-router VPNs, like Linksys (BEF)SX41s and VP41s, you cannot talk to someone with the same DNA (IP address on the same segment) through a tunnel.
You must use distinctly different segments at each end, or a packet in the tunnel doesn't know which way to turn...
or red book? Is there any documentation or experiences with virtual addresses working?
They are supposed to be able to land you on the same LAN segment - 192.168.1.114 should be able to gain access to 192.168.1.0, when things go right.
But they don't. When targeting a Linksys BEFVP41...
Virtual addresses for Sentinel/SoftRemote clients are purportedly able to get you onto the same LAN segment as that implied by the virtual address.
E.g., my target is a faraway segment: 192.168.1.0 (with LAN gateway at 192.168.1.50).
I set my virtual address at 192.168.1.114 and these software...
I experienced this problem on SSH-Sentinel, and then upgraded to its commercial successor - SafeNet's SoftRemote - but continue to be virtually shut out of my target LAN.
Target LAN is accessed by Linksys (BEF)VP-41, with static IP address on the Net. Subnet there is 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.