Search results for query: *

It seems that when a machine has dual nics it likes to share that fact with other machines. Here's my scenario: I have a server, ServerA, with two nics. One with a 150.102.x.x address to the corporate network and one with a 10.x.x.x address for a private network. When I map a drive to another...

It seems that when a machine has dual nics it likes to share that fact with other machines. Here's my scenario: I have a server, ServerA, with two nics. One with a 150.102.x.x address to the corporate network and one with a 10.x.x.x address for a private network. When I map a drive to another...

When I want to move a client machine from one domain to another, should you go to a workgroup first? Or just go from domain to domain. I like to do things orderly so I always go to a workgroup first and it's what I recommend but does it really matter? Thanks.

I have a WinNT4 workstation (system1) that has two nics. Nic1 to the main coporate backbone and Nic2 (192.168 address) that is only for a local network. I have a drive mapped to another server (system2) via the corporate connection, nic1. All is fine but eventually we start seeing the Nic2...

I have a WinNT4 workstation (system1) that has two nics. Nic1 to the main coporate backbone and Nic2 (192.168 address) that is only for a local network. I have a drive mapped to another server (system2) via the corporate connection, nic1. All is fine but eventually we start seeing the Nic2...

Ok I'm new to the Perl world and have tried to figure this out on my own, and via surfing surfing the web. However now I'm hitting a deadline and need some help! I'm running Windows 2000, and interogating NT4 and Win2000 boxes. I have written a perl program that goes out to remote machines...

Would there be a problem adding a second nic to a machine (Window 2000 pro) and having both nics set for dhcp and both connected to the same gateway/router(i.e. dhcp server)? When I do this I don't get any address on either one (well I get the 169.xxx). However if I put a fixed address on...

We were using NT workstation as a file server and kept bumping into the 10 connection limit. So we then upgraded the installation to NT Server. Here's the problem. We are still limited to the 10 connections. During the upgrade we chose "per server" and selected 35. When you look...

Seems the latest, Aug 19th, version on Intelligent Updater doesn't work with version 5.01.01 of NAV. Actually I haven't had the need to use Intelligent Updater for about 6 months but it was fine before. Anybody else see this or know a way around it other than updating the version of NAV. I...

We currently run Norton Antivirus Version 5. I have been told by Symantec that it is no longer supported and hasn't been for some time. Also they state that no new defintion files are available either. My question concerns the updates. We do in fact receive updates for this product. Which...

I had always heard that 216 was one bear of an exam. I'm currently studying for 218 and from what I have read in some posts, it seems that 218 is everything 216 is, plus more...yikes! Does that seem to be the case? Thanks.