Thank you for taking the time and effort for this rather lengthy reply. I appreciate it.
By "network share", you mean a shared folder on the server and the workstations must map this shared folder to a certain drive letter, right?
I also agree with you that copying the EXE into a local folder...
Wow. It's up there in the food chain alright. That's kinda like having a Lamborghini to deliver newspapers in a neighborhood. Thanks for pointing this to me. This is perfect for a company with a sizable IT inventory.
I simply needed a simple way to update EXEs across multiple workstations.
Hi Guys,
I know this has been discussed. I would just like to get your various methodologies in doing EXE updates across multiple workstations using the app so I can decide on which to adopt.
Thanks in advance.
Chriss,
I had an OLD form class used for generating reports wherein I use as part of my Validation routine the 'direct addressing' of a form control that has an invalid value.
The Validate routine will go through all controls (textboxes usually). If the Value is invalid, I passed the offending...
Hi Guys,
Is there some VFP function or Property that will return the "complete address" of a form control?
This is what I mean:
Suppose I have a textbox named txtFirstname, which is inside Page1 of pgfMain found in a form. How can I get its complete address...
Well, for MariaDB, from hereon out, I will use "ORDER BY id" then.
Again, kinda weird, coz MySQL has always shown the resulting rows already arranged.
Thanks!
Well, for MariaDB, from hereon out, I will use "ORDER BY id" then.
Again, kinda weird, coz MySQL has always shown the resulting rows already arranged.
Thanks!
The reason I used sequential GUIDs is just to make sure they are ordered in the "natural order" of entry of the invoice details (child) rows.
This has worked for me ever since I used MySQL, as a "workaround" to our VFP table record number.
This is really strange. Ever since I have used MySQL, I have never used "ORDER BY id" to make sure they are in the 'natural' sequential order.
No worries though. I will explicitly put "ORDER BY id" from hereon out since I am now with MariaDB.
Thanks.
Kindly check my reply to mJindrova.
I have been using MySQL and it always shows the records sequentially - by the sequential GUID - without the need to put "ORDER BY id". It is only when I migrated to MariaDB recently that I noticed this behavior. If this really is the default behavior, then no...
Hi,
If you execute the same using MySQL, it orders it sequentially with out adding an "ORDER BY id".
Strangely though, if you:
select * from SODTL
without any WHERE clause, it will arrange it "correctly" - sequentially.
Only when you place a WHERE clause will it show the rows in reverse order.
Hi Guys,
I use sequential GUIDs for both my Invoice header and detail tables. Ever since I moved to MariaDb, it was only now that I noticed that if I do a select of the invoice detail rows of a particular header row, MariaDB shows the rows in REVERSE order! I have to explicitly add a "ORDER BY...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.