Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations Rhinorhino on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Recent content by theguyfromhere
-
static nat
ser0/0 is a t1 coming from our isp, is my understanding that you never assing ips to ser0/0 always to sbinterfaces. But if i can't have sub interfaces on the same subnet, i very simply cant do what i want here, and that does indeed answer my question. Im not sure if i need FR or not, im...- theguyfromhere
- Post #7
- Forum: Cisco
-
static nat
oky doke, from the begnning. the picture "howitwas" is how it was, no IP on ser0/0, and ser0/0.1 was bonded somehow to eth0/0, and eth0/0 had our first public IP. since eth 0/0 had the first public ip, i cant give a public ip to any subinterface of ser0/0. we had a firebox that did the natting...- theguyfromhere
- Post #5
- Forum: Cisco
-
static nat
very simply to set up a static route. i want out public ip (10.1.1.204) to forward to our internal ip (172.124.1.4). i cant assign a public IP to ser0/0 since it overlaps with the one assinged to eth0/0. so im lost. in my experince, you assing the first public IP to ser0/0.1 not to eth0/0...- theguyfromhere
- Post #3
- Forum: Cisco
-
static nat
We have 2 new T1's in place, but we needed to keep our old T1 as we needed the ip's that came with it, and the company wouldn't lease the ip's to us. at any rate, we have 10.1.1.93/26 as our public ips, we use .93 .94 .200 .205 and .204. The goal was to have static nat of the public IP's to...- theguyfromhere
- Thread
- Replies: 7
- Forum: Cisco
