The MFC-7460DN is a host-based printer.
I will never print from UNIX.
The DCN-8110DN should work. (Along with any other Brother that supports PCL emulation)
I recently installed WinXP on my inlaw's pc (AMD K6-2 500MHz, 384MB ram) and I noticed that the machine ran much better afterward. It seemed faster and was much more stable. The most noticable speed increase was during booting.
Depends on your processor. I am assumeing that you do not have one of the new Intel or AMD 64-bit processors, so you should use the IA-32 version.
You should make sure of what processor you have before you do this, just to be safe. I am also assumeing that you would know if you had a 64-bit...
The 600E never came with s HDD bigger than 10GB. It is possible that it doesn't support anything over 10GB.
Is it going streight into diags when you turn the unit on? If so, it believes there is a problem somewhere. Is it returning an error code?
Cool. Thanks for the responces guys. What I'm getting is that the lower density sticks are OK to use, but they may not be quite as optimized as high density sticks. That's what I needed to know.
Ah, OK. That also makes sence. Just wanted to know if there was a reason I sould be leary. A friend of mine asked me about this and I didn't really know exactly what to tell him. Thanks.
I understand what DDR SDRAM and SDRAM are and what the differences are. What I need to know is what the difference between "high-density" and "non high-density" DDR SDRAM is. I assume that high density is higher quality memory, but I'm not sure about that.
I assume this means that there are more chips on the stick and that is bad because more chips = higher propagation delay (slower responce). Have I assumed correctly ro does this mean something else altogether?
OK, here is the output of running configure (./configure):
checking build system type... i686-pc-sco3.2v5.0.6
checking host system type... i686-pc-sco3.2v5.0.6
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes
checking for ranlib... :
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking for rm... /bin/rm...
I do have the SCO versions of both Make and GCC. I am not useing the devolopment package, but I do think we have it. Let me find the specific erroe and I will post it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.