Recent content by Shauneee

The way we used to do it (when we had CM3) was to call a "common vector" that did all the out-of-hours processing... so the 20+ vectors would all have a step in that called the "are we closed" vector which after some simple time-of-day checks would either play "sorry we are closed" and...

Hi TDMoIP Got exactly the same setup here (MXEE 2 running on a CM 5.2.1 system) - I went for AAR as although got the off-pbx working fine, I read a couple of posts that said people could only get it working to a maximum number of call presentations on the off-pbx station - doing it via aar just...

No problemo - just didn't thinks vectors work that way - never got that working myself - Basically, I've found that if you "route to number" in a vector I've only had it go to the next step if the route-to failed (e.g. you put in your route-to external number and there were no external lines -...

Have you considered "Remote Coverage" - it's been a while since I set it up on our system (and we now use vectors but that's another story!)... Basically you point your DDI direct at the group and then set a cover path up to a remote / off-pbx number - such as a cell phone... I have a niggling...

Right, have found a 2010 (in former said dusty cupboard) and can confirm that POTS/IP phones and Digital phones on CM can "talk" quite happily to POTS or Digital (2010) phones on the 403DT - i.e. get 2 way speech...

All :-) Have tried IP (4610 & 4620), Digital (6408) and just a plain old POTS - that's why I was so confused - it *shouldn't* work but it does - maybe is something to do with "as long as it's not another IPO on the other end" (never really looked into H.323 setup messages that much)

Ah - there's a thought - I just use a POTS phone as had one handy - I'm just going to dig out a digitial phone (think got some 2010's about)

mines 3.0(580) as well... wonder if it will only work from a CM platform then? (really can't see why as it *should* just be a standard H.323 trunk - but then again, we all know about standards don't we)

was going to say, I never try to do too much admin work on a Friday afternoon :-)

Hi Westi Guess it has to be a "DT" version then - there must be "something magical inside" (aka some basic IP/TDM briding) as amriddle01 got exactly the same findings as me - will be intrested to see TomMills's results (going to put the magical "workload dependant" disclaimer in here but if...

Westi - it's definitly a 403DT isn't it?

Cool - no worries... Maybe SCN is the issue - my 403DT is just setup as a plain old H.323 IP Trunk (although not sure on amriddle01's setup when he managed to replicate my findings) - if not, sort of pours water on my bonfire - back to the drawing board as to why on earth I can get 1 way calling!...

Ok think amriddle01 has already tried that - where have you pulled the VCM from - the 406 or 403DT (indeed, does the 403DT have a VCM in it)... What I suspect is that as long as something is talking to the 403DT via an IP trunk, the 403DT will get a speech path - if you've pulled the VCM out the...

Hi TomMills If it is a 403 DT then.... sort-of... (Indeed, think amriddle01 would confirm that - see his previous posts) - Ok, I'm trunking from CM 3.1.5 but guess that should be largely irrelivant as it is just a H.323 trunk (and in my case using 64K ALAW 20ms packets) - you definitly get...

Well at least it is consistant then - guess downer on my side as lowers any potential value on eBay (as it's not unique) ;-) - has to be something to do with how things are internally bridged then I guess - I really can't explain it otherwise - still, as it's only going to be used for an...