Recent content by scotto27

I gotcha. Thanks for the replies. I'll just pop an extended tape in next time and see what happens.

That's what all indications would be for me too, but if it says hardware compression enabled in the job log. Shouldn't it be able to get near 40 GB? Thanks, Scott

The job wasn't actually in "Failed" state, it was at "Loading Media". I am using DD4 20/40 tapes and hardware compression is working it says. I removed about 2 GB's worth of data from the backup jobs, and it has been successfully backing up 21 GB on used tapes. Not sure what is going on.

Can't seem to nail this one down. Windows 2000 Server SP3 Backup Exec 8.60 Rev. 3878 (Server Edition, IDR) Lately I've been getting the media ejected after about 23 GB, and it sits at Loading Media. Hardware compression is enabled on this DDS4. I have 'None' selected under Tools ->...

Well, I grabbed the default gateway for the cable modem and tried like you said using the ip next-hop with my original config with the 190 ad on the static route and it works! I don't know why it likes the routing table now all of a sudden, but so far so good. Thanks, Scott

I understand what you are saying about the next hop IP address, but currently the cable modem is not a static address, so I am using dchp client on the Cisco interface - so it is just easier right now not having to worry about that piece and just point it to the interface. I gotcha on the...

One last bit of info, the default route is given to the router from the T1 via EIGRP. Scott

Okay, getting very close. It is now down to a routing issue I believe. If I put a static route to a certain website say: ip route xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.255 FastEthernet0/1 It goes out the Fa0/1 interface over the cable modem, woohoo! I have a different static route from before of: ip...

One other note I should have made. When I used your NAT statements and my other one that NAT'ed based on the route map, I do see the cable modem ip address being NAT'ed with my FA0/0 IP address (PAT'ed). So the NAT statement appears to be working in my instances and when I have viewed my route...

I don't actually have any other ip route statements. I thought there should be one for s0/0.2 also, but this it came without that setup from my ISP and has been working without it for 3 years now. I was always curious why I don't need that. I originally used the "set ip next-hop" with the IP...

Okay, here we go (I cleansed the ip address info and removed unneccessary stuff like banners, etc.): interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 214.XX.60.XX 255.255.255.224 ip nat inside no ip mroute-cache speed auto full-duplex ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay no...

Correct, the ip's in use are all real, routable ip addresses. I just used the ones above for the example. I've been messing around with the NAT piece but can't seem to get it right. On Fa0/0 I added: ip nat inside On Fa0/1 I added: ip nat outside Then I also added: ip nat inside source...

yes, keep 2 internet connections at the same time. eventually i want to set them up to provide failover, but for right now, just want to send http traffic out the cable modem, all the rest over the t1. not sure what you mean about a dhcp range from the cable modem. i am running the dhcp...

Ah, yes. My fault. They are not the same subnet, I confused the config with the diagram I did, assume s0/0 is 172.16.10.30. Prior to connecting the cable modem to the Cisco router, I used a Linksys and a laptop with the cable modem and it worked well. I then verified that the Cisco router...

Setup: T1 Cable Modem | | | | |-----------------------------------| | S0/0 Fa0/1 | |10.10.10.3 192.168.10.10 | | Cisco 2621 | | |...