If I recall correctly you can switch to the generic or standard IDE controller, reboot, and then run sysprep. In the past I used this along with the -pnp switch to enumerate all of the hardware. It adds about 5-10 minutes per clone, but it has worked for me.
Are you sure the IP address is not being used anywhere else? Does the IP address fall within the subnet mask? More than likely you are using a private IP so disclosing the information won't compromise anything, bt sanitize as needed. Can you give us a known working config from one of the servers...
Excuse me while I express myself...
I have experienced it before and I was trying to help an apparently difficult person. I guess there is only one error message in Ghost and if that is the case then there must also be only one version of Ghost as well. Why don't you try to enlighten us as to...
Without specifics on the error message I don't think anyone is going to be able to really help you out. I doubt this problem is specific to a 1650 but rather to the NIC. What is the "correct" driver that you downloaded? What model is the NIC? Can you post the sanitized(for your protection)...
I had the exact same problem. Hopefully, this points you in the correct direction. Under Network - Logon Accounts make sure there is a System Logon Account under description. Some how it got wiped out during the upgrade or never existed and 9.0 never complained. Restart all Backup Exec services...
Have you seen the How to resolve Common "Windows Installer" Problems page? They list 10 methods to fix WI.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;555175
Going back to your original error message, is the event logged? Can you provide that info?
A google search pulls up a ton of info on the error message and a error number will help narrow it down.
Just because you know something does not mean you can prove it.
My opinion is coming from a regulated background. Employees must sign a computer use agreement with spells out that they have no or limited privacy rights when using the company's equipment. It goes further to say that an...
It sounds like this admin's boss is trying to find an IT solution to a personnel problem he should be dealing with. A classic case of trying to avoid the real issue.
I don't think this is the case. If he needs to take administrative action he needs solid proof and not speculation.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.