Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

Register Log in
  • Congratulations Chriss Miller on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Recent content by Oldcomputerman

  1. Oldcomputerman

    Cisco NAT and udp forwarding weirdnes

    I gave up on the ACL method, and just used a script to generate a S**t load of ip nat insides for the udp ports I needed. I truncated the port numbers from the default 10001-20000 for RTP, as this is a home asterisk server, that number of ports really isn't needed. I changed to port range in the...
  2. Oldcomputerman

    Cisco NAT and udp forwarding weirdnes

    Yes Burt, I still do software support, and hardware services on old DEC stuff, including chip level repairs. My Email server is a microvax 3100. In the Cisco router access-list port 64215 is open for, get ready for it, Decnet over IP.
  3. Oldcomputerman

    Cisco NAT and udp forwarding weirdnes

    Thanks guys for the replies. As Burtsbees said, the "standard" ip nat inside static udp does work, but only opens a single port. I did that method when the access list didn't work, and the sip signalling did work. Then problem with this is the number of udp ports that have to be open for the SIP...
  4. Oldcomputerman

    Cisco NAT and udp forwarding weirdnes

    Hi gurus, I have been beating my head against the screen on this. Here's a short history. Netgear RT311 was doing the job, sortof, forwarding inbound SIP extensions to my Asterisk server, but would screwup its NAT tables after awhle, and have to be rebooted. (annoying as hell). The router...
See more

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top