Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations TouchToneTommy on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Recent content by OIS
-
Accurate systemtime i.e. without ACCEPT
Thank you prakal, it works (of course) but what I really want is the format you see in SMF-records or in a DB2-timestamp. That is '2004-08-31-10.00.00.000000'. I'm now reading a DB2-timestamp but that uses 5-7 times more resources (CPU) than methods like you suggested.- OIS
- Post #3
- Forum: COBOL General discussion
-
Accurate systemtime i.e. without ACCEPT
I'm looking for a way to read the systemtime from the MVS control blocks in order to get a more precise systemtime. With trial and error I managed this LINKAGE section. 01 CTLBLK-001. 05 PTR001 pointer occurs 256. 01 CTLBLK-002. 05 PTR002 pointer occurs 256...- OIS
- Thread
- Replies: 4
- Forum: COBOL General discussion
-
Systemtime more accurate
I would like to have the systemtime more accurate than hh.mm.ss.nn. E.g. like the DB2-timestamp format CCYY-MM-DD-HH.MM.SS.nnnnnn. There must be a way to get this out of MVS Data Areas or something like that. But I don't know how. Who can help??- OIS
- Thread
- Replies: 2
- Forum: COBOL General discussion
