Recent content by nater

OK, great. Thanks.

Ha.. well, that's stupid.. =) "in many cases"? So sometimes these options will work?

OK, does the justify option not work in the BWidget MessageDlg? Whether I do MessageDlg .msgdlg -parent . -message "Why doesn't\nthis thing work?" -type ok -justify center -icon info or even MessageDlg .msgdlg -parent . -message "Why doesn't this thing work?&quot...

Hmm ok, I didn't see that warning.. I will still report the bug. Maybe you can answer something for me.. What's a better way to perform a command when the textvariable of an entry is modified? Actually, I guess I could do a key bind. I'm sure I rejected that for some reason though...

But.. this works fine: set entryspace "Initial" entry .e -textvar entryspace -validate key -validatecommand "set wack 1" set head "Line header:" set inline "Line header: entry" set yap [regexp "$head ?(.*)$" $inline match temp] set entryspace...

OK.. that makes a bit more sense now.. I still think I'd classify it as a bug though.. the difference was my entry also had a validatecommand. Soooo set entryspace "Initial" entry .e -textvar entryspace -validate key -validatecommand "set wack 1" set head "Line...

Hmm.. that's interesting.. when I have a minute I'll make a small test program and see if I can re-create my bug.. I'm on 2000 with 8.3.4, so that's not why.. there must be another factor here.. I'll post again.

Found a minor bug - I think - in TCL.. Specifically, regexp can't seem to store a match into an entry text variable. IE set entryspace "Initial" entry .e -textvar entryspace set head "Line header:" set inline "Line header: entry" set yap [regexp "$head...

Uhh.. well, that doesn't exactly answer my question... But I can tell you how to do the incorporation part. At least one way to do it. If you want to run in from you C executable (rather than loading C packages into TCL/TK, which is somewhat easier, and documented all over the place, you've...

Hi all.. I'd like to find some way to allow a user to run a C program I've written with a TK GUI (I used Tk_Main to incorporate tk into my C code) without having to install TCL/TK. I thought this would be a simple matter of throwing some .dlls in the directory, but once I put in Tcl83.dll and...

OK. If you set /subsystem:windows in the linker options, it doesn't give you a console window. The downside is that for sooome reason, your entry point then has to be WinMain instead of Main. It has a different set of arguments, and more importantly - for me - I already need my main function...

I have basically the same problem. I'm doing all my I/O through TCL/TK, but the console window still pops up because everything's integrated into a C++ win32 console program.. I find it hard to believe that there's no way to hide the window without switching to a lesser compiler. Seems like...

Care to explain? This is a simple console application we're talking about. I have the same question. I don't want to bring in a bunch of windows stuff. None, ideally. I'd just like an application with no console window.

Ack.. my bad. That last one.. worked, but I didn't really understand why. It should have been more like this. The "sizeof(char)" part is unnecessary, as you know it's 1 byte, but it makes it a bit easier to follow.. (At least, if you're me.) Basically what the linkvar function...

Just a note on the following: /* RPB - No need for a cast before cArray here * This allocates memory for size number of pointers * to char */ cArray = malloc(size * sizeof(char *)); First, a lot of compilers won't *let* you cast the l-value. Second, I was doing...