Recent content by jockojem

Hi All I am currently doing R+D on 3rd party SSL vpn. Obviously one of the advantages is the ability to cleanse a client of session data. As part of the process of building a test plan a colleague posed me a question that I can't answer. Is there anyway to view independently the contents of the...

Thanks thedaver for your help... although I think you misunderstand my dilemma slightly. As I understand it the rpm I want to install won't install because /usr/sbin/update-alternatives isn't present. I did some reading on this and this appears to be a debian tool for dealing with symbolic...

Hello! I am trying to install some .rpm packages for Aplaws (based on the RedHat CMS app) on Advanced Server 2.1. One of the packages produces a dependency warning as follows... [root@aplaws root]# rpm -Uvh ccm-tools-servlet-resin-2.1.1-2.noarch.rpm error: failed dependencies...

Thanks for your input guys - I took the cowards way out and reinstalled with AS2.1. Jem

Ha ha! Apt-get has 11 missing dependencies...Some of which appear to be gcc components... :-(

Thanks guys gcc alone requires binutils >=2.12.90.0.7-1 glibc-devel >=2.2.90-12 libgcc >=3.2.2-5 These then have there own problems. The real stumbling block though is glibc-devel-2.3.2-11.9.i386.rpm. When I try to install glibc-common to enable this I recieve the following error. glibc <...

Hi All I am trying to install gcc-3.2.2-5.i386.rpm on Red Hat 9 and am encountering dependency hell. A search around newsgroups suggests that the quickest route out is to install "the development utilities from the red hat cd". However this wasn't done at install and no-one seems to be able to...

Andy... I sent you a text ... did you get it?

Andy I'm very well cheers. Sounds like a fine solution... now who owes who a drink?!!! Jem

Mac You can set this in a gpo > User>Windows>IEMaintenance>Programs. Have you set it there? Trust you are well old buddy? Jem

bofh Check out.... thread48-685480. Jem

Thanks for the reassurance - I guess I knew that - I just always fear the wacky and the catastrophic! :-)

That's not really what I was concerned about. My worry is/was that as the schema partition cannot marked as authoritative for restore that if i have to roll back the extensions a replicated copy from another dc would be able to supercede my rollback.

Thanks for your response Silvias. The way I am feeling about this now is that as the Schema Master is a single as opposed to Multi master role there will no other writable copies of the schema in the forest with higher version numbers a System State restore will do the trick. Any one else...

Hello All I am planning on extending the schema of the root domain in our forest this week by running Exch2003 ForestPrep. Now - I may be a little over cautious - but I am concerned that I don't have a rollback plan in case of catastrophe. I understand that the schema partition of AD cannot be...