Recent content by jmborr

Great! Many thanks for the info. -jmborr

Hi Here's a sintax in the constructor I've never seen, nor can I find an explanation: class foo{ public: foo(int a): b(a) {} //the constructor private: int b; }; One could define foo(int a){ b=a; }. Why the different definition? jmborr

If this is the case, then I'm in trouble because I generate multiple definitions of "foo" ! If I include "template.h" into files "one.cpp" and "two.cpp", and then I do "g++ one.o two.o", I will generate two definitions of "foo&quot...

Hi all, I have a &quot;template.h&quot; file with a class template declaration, and I have &quot;template.cpp&quot; file with the definition of this class template. It turns out that I have the following compilation error: undefined reference to `vec<double>::foo()' After googling, I found a...

Wow, who could have imagined this? I was puzzled because I had also defined operators '+', '+=&quot; and I had no complain with these ones. Thank you for the huge help :) jose

Hi all, For some reason, my derived class does not inherit the operator '=' of my base class, which is a class template, when I compile with g++ //=========== base class template<class T> class vec{ public: vec &operator=( vec ) ; }; //=========== derived class class vec_d : vec<double> { }...

Hi all, For some reason, my derived class does not inherit the operator '=' of my base class, which is a class template, when I compile with g++ //=========== base class template<class T> class vec{ public: vec &operator=( vec ) ; }; //=========== derived class class vec_d : vec<double> { }...