Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations bkrike on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Recent content by forrest33

  1. forrest33

    Update Records on Input Form

    the form is based on a Business Expansion table, where one of the column is Company Name, linked to Company Name in a Manufacurer table. The Company Name combo box has as a record source the Company Name in the Manuf.table. Is this correct? I was trying to build a macro around the on update...
  2. forrest33

    Update Records on Input Form

    the record source for Company Name is a combo box in another table, where it does have an ID.
  3. forrest33

    Update Records on Input Form

    I have an input form that contains a Company Name field. The source of this field is a lookup column in another table. The input form receives info in regards to each Company Name. However, when I choose a certain company, I do not get the related info displayed on the form, although the backend...
  4. forrest33

    Display Record Updates After Entering Data

    I have an input form. It has, among ohter fields, a Company Name (drop down lookup in a Manufacturers table) and a Memo field. I can enter nice and easy info and it does go into my backend table, no problem. However, I want the form to display the newly entered info for every Company Name that I...
  5. forrest33

    Brain Dead in Designing Tables - This Is Tough

    The data in the ProductNAICS table is flawed. Hence the lack of referential integrity. The person entering the information is checking it right now and she found two typos already. I'll keep you guys posted. Thank you for your patience.
  6. forrest33

    Brain Dead in Designing Tables - This Is Tough

    Did the check. No return. All fields are populated. [ponder]
  7. forrest33

    Brain Dead in Designing Tables - This Is Tough

    PHV, Yes, that's what I was trying to do, without success, since I am getting the following error message: For the design of the relationship, please see my previous posts.
  8. forrest33

    Brain Dead in Designing Tables - This Is Tough

    For CompanyNAICS - composite PK NAICS and CompanyID, both indexed and duplicates OK.
  9. forrest33

    Brain Dead in Designing Tables - This Is Tough

    Yep,PH, that's exactly what I have. Cannot Enforce Referential Integrity btw CompanyNAICS and ProductNAICS, hence no One-to-Many Relationship, can only have a simple link btw the two.
  10. forrest33

    Brain Dead in Designing Tables - This Is Tough

    Thought so too, but it ain't enough. All 3 tables have indexed PK, yet the relationship btw. 2 of them (see above)is not working [surprise]
  11. forrest33

    Brain Dead in Designing Tables - This Is Tough

    Those are my three tables, the tblCompanyNAICS is based on the qryNormalized that you helped me with. I ran the qryNormalized and made a table out of it, tblCompanyNAICS, populated and everything. Then, I deleted the tblCompany fields for NAICS1, 2 etc, like you suggested, for data...
  12. forrest33

    Brain Dead in Designing Tables - This Is Tough

    Nope, got sintax errors on qryNormalized. Does not work. What if I kept the working qryNormalized and ran a Make-Table query for my CompanyNAICS table? I could then delete the original CompanyNAICS table and the NAICS1, 2 etc. from the CompanyTbl, for nomalization. Lemme know what you think...
  13. forrest33

    Brain Dead in Designing Tables - This Is Tough

    Thanks to pbodsky, my Union Query (qryNormalized) is working fine now. I'm still working on the Append Query, maybe you guys can see errors I'm blind to.
  14. forrest33

    Brain Dead in Designing Tables - This Is Tough

    For some reason, only NAICS 1,3 and 5 are showing in the CompanyNaics table. NAICS 2, 4 and 6 are not. Makes me think I should rename the fields. This one gives me an error msg about the NAICS1
  15. forrest33

    Brain Dead in Designing Tables - This Is Tough

    Thanks, Leslie, Followed your advice ad literam. Ran into problems with the Union Query - it will only pick NAICS1, NAICS3 and NAICS5 for some reason. I kept looking long and hard at the code, seems fine to me. The Append Query does not like the NAICS1 field. I got an error message about it...

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top