Recent content by Flexxy

i know i know... it's not that i don't know other ways to get it. But the PC port mirroring is an very easy way i prefer most of the times when coming to Nortel phones. Just activate the described setting... connect laptop and there we go... afterwards just deactivate it again .. and that's...

Hi all, i've tried to sniffer trace all the traffic from/to a 9640 phone (with wireshark) at its own PC port. I can't see any traffic between phone and IPO therefor it seems to be a real switch built in. So is there any possibility ..any setting i have to activate (temporarily) ...(like there...

amriddle thanks for this info ... i've tried this with my phones here but it isn't working the way you said. Let's say 720 has "Forward No Answer All Calls" to 429 as well as "Follow Me To" 998. 429 and 998 have no special forwarding or Follow Me (beside Voicemail). Someone now calls 720 -...

that's correct amriddle01 ... BUT .. :) i'm talking about "Follow Me To" not "Follow Me Here".

Hi Peter this is the description i know. But i can't see any difference in call handling. For example... let's use "Forward unconditional all calls" instead of Follow Me for the user you've mentioned. So this user is sitting at another phone for half of the day ... but instead of Follow Me...

sorry, forgot to mention... it's an Avaya IP Office 500v2 Rel. 7.0(5)

Hi all, i know there is/was a thread handling this topic already but for an older system and with different results. At least i can't get these results (Voicemail handling, 2nd forwarding etc.) described in this old thread. In my tests i can't see any difference between "Follow Me To" and...

Hi again, you were right...these solutions also hide my normal forwarding options so i can't do it this way. Well.. seems we have to live with it :( Thx to all

Ah.. thanks you two :-) i will try this settings file thing next Monday

Thanks amriddle01 for your answer. It's not that i think of a new or global password for this feature but why not use this user's login password as verification? That's what i'd have expected.

Hi All, do i understand it right that it's not possible to protect users from a "Follow Me Here" by other users? System: IP Office 500v2 R6.1 with 16xx and 96xx phones So is every user able to route the extension of another user to his own phone by "Follow Me Here" function without a...