Recent content by falinxcopernicus

Thanks guys, I just needed the answer no there :-) The reason we use the diginet line is because it's reliable. Adsl is classified as a best effort service for a reason, and therefore is not suited for any purpose other than web browsing.

Hey everyone, I have an idea in mind. We have two connections here at work a slower diginet connection and a much faster adsl connection. Is there anyway to redirect mails over say 1Mb through the dsl connection but using the diginet line as the standard route? And if so, how? Thanks in advance...

Hi everyone, we have a 3600 router which our main dialin router for our business. Now the problem is that even after I have added the notebooks to the domain on the domain, when the user dials in (it authenticates with the cisco secure database using tacacs+) they try to browse to the server...

Thanks, but that is not what the users are complaining about. The users are saying that the time for the meeting was immediately set as booked, not accepted, when the appointment was received in the mail box, ie they would see the meeting time block booked even without reading the appointment...

Hi everyone, I have a couple of users on our network that are complaining that before the rollup service pack, whenever they received a calendar meeting request it would (without them viewing the calendar booking request or agreeing to it) put the time in as booked. I don't believe this as I...

We've had this issue just once and guess what... it's only been since we upgraded from norton 8 to 9. I'm telling you I have never worked with such sh*t software in all my life. I am convinced that this is causing the issue as it's a constant battle to get norton to function like a normal piece...

not sure but the final conclusion to this whole palava for anyone who is experiencing the same issue as me is that the server needed the much understated rollup service pack... ie f**king microsoft couldn't just call it sp4 no they had to go and confuse the whole issue and call it something...

okay looks like the problem has reared it's ugly head again. The bridgehead server was not the issue. hmmmm will have to keep pondering this one again.

OMS it would seem I have found something relating to the issue which is more than likely the problem. it's the server on the receiving side that is the issue. I made the silly mistake of hearing from the user "any external domain" when really what they should have said is only one domain that...

Hi guys, so I did what rtichnor said and I found this when I looked at the source in outlook express from a message that was a test a few days ago for a meeting at 12pm... BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft CDO for Microsoft Exchange VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Jerusalem...

Guys thank you very much for your help but as stated in my first and second posts, I have tried multiple clients all with the correct time zone settings, even installed office on the server with the correct time zone setting and yet it still does this. I found out something interesting yesterday...

Thanks Zelandakh, but it definitely is not a time zone issue. Standard e-mails coming through the server have the correct timestamp even the received times of "meeting schedules" are correct. It's just the actual appointment which is incorrect and I have tried from several clients and the server...

Hi everyone, I know this sounds like it has nothing to do with exchange but it does. Whenever any of our users send a meeting request externally the meeting request is 1 hour behind the actual requested meeting time. If they send it to any user internally it is fine. Thought it might be the...

Hi everybody. We currently have a very unstable kvm switch on our NT4 based machines. Now if for some reason we lose keyboard comms with the machines, they won't communicate with the keyboard again without a reboot. Plugging any keyboard in directly won't work either. Is there any way around...

Hi everyone, we are about to upgrade/downgrade (depending on which way you look at it :-) ) from using an NT4 exch5.5 as a bridgehead and then a win2k exch2k machine as our primary server, to just the 2k machine with no bridgehead. Are there any pitfalls that people can point out so that things...