Recent content by eabbink

/whine mode on ah cmon, help a guy out /whine mode off but seriously, anyone? ;)

ok, understood. You're diagram is close but my situation is a little different though so here's the complete diagram: ROUTER_A <------------HSRP-----------> ROUTER_B |\ | | \ | | \...

anyone?

then I think wybnormal suggestions will work fine. If you balance your outbound traffic by ip range/ISP the return traffic will take the same way which effectively balances your return traffic. I was talking with a situation in mind where there's (also) a lot of inbound traffic, like indeed...

hmm, I'm not sure I understand how this will work. But that could be me :) you certainly can load-balance outgoing traffic with static routes etc but how would that balance incoming traffic? And with regard to fault tolerance, if you dont use BGP that means (afaik) that a certain ip address is...

Hi, I *think* what you want is not possible with said hardware, but I'm not familiar enough with the 2503. for such a setup you need to use BGP since you are going to two different ISP's. And since you want load-balancing you need to have the full internet routing table loaded which I think...

Ah :) the other router is in the same vlan attached to the same switches. But it has only one ethernet port and less WAN/ISDN ports. Thats also one of the main reasons I want to keep the 2611 usable/up for as long as possible. Esger

Hi, I have a solution to the above question but it's not without some problems so I thought to ask here what is considered the best way to do it. the situation is as follows: The 2950's are linked by their two gigabit ports and are divided into a few vlans. The 2611 is situated in one of...

yup, that is correct. MPPP should be able to link all kinds of interfaces. I was thinking only of isdn B-channel-bonding . sorry for the confusion.

multilink wont work over multiple bri interfaces as it's an ISDN interface feature for linking the (2) B-channels of the ISDN line. You may be able to do load-balancing though over multiple interfaces. dialers, dialer-pools and groups are more flexible than dialer maps. a dialer is a virtual...

you have the enable password for it? if so, in enable mode: conf term no access-list XXX where XXX is the number of the acl (you can look that up in the current config with 'show run') remember to save the new config ('write mem') Esger

Unfortunately it's just a 2611, meaning no fastethernets.. I just tried the 'no bridge 1 bridge ip' command but that results in no communication possible at all. (Please note that I only did some quick testing as it's in a live network) On a sidenote, up until recently only the HSRP ip was...

wouldnt the router take care of that itself? As I understand it the hsrp config will cause the router to create a virtual mac address and use that instead of the one from the interface. so wouldnt an extra mac for the bvi just simply be ignored? and remember, it works right when freshly...

I havent got a debug from during the actual event of losing the ip. I do have checked the standby status after loss and the router still owns the ip and is in active state as far as it is concerned. the bvi interface and the ethernet interfaces are all fine. this is also proved by the fact that...

anyone please?