Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations bkrike on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Recent content by DaHui
-
IPSec through pix
First of all thank you for replying. I have this option on already for my VPN configuration. Any other ideas?- DaHui
- Post #4
- Forum: Security, hacker detection & forensics
-
-
IPSec through pix
Hello all - I am trying to establish an ipsec connection between a MS 2k3 Server in my dmz and a MS 2k3 Server on my inside network. I have tried the following setup with no sucess. the inside net is 10.x.x.x and the dmz is 172.16.1.x static (inside,dmz) 10.0.0.0 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 0...- DaHui
- Thread
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Security, hacker detection & forensics
-
Seemingly Random Malfunctions
KOPAR - I would suspect the problem to be in this line of code on your pix. access-list private deny tcp any range 3127 3198 any I am assuming you are using this rule to block the payload in the NoVarg.a virus? Good idea however, Windows cycles through tcp ports for different net requests... -
Seemingly Random Malfunctions
Here is a cisco page that explains NAT Vs. PAT http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a00800b6e1a.shtml Mix NAT and PAT Global Statements "In this example, the ISP has again provided the network manager with a range of addresses from 199.199.199.1... -
Seemingly Random Malfunctions
Actually if you only provide the pix with one ip for the global it will default to PAT. Therefore, KOPAR you are correct. Sorry I can't help you with your actual problem.
