Recent content by caltman

Something like this might work - Private Sub tbxTest_LostFocus() Dim frmCtl As control Dim bFound As Boolean Dim nextTab As Integer bFound = False nextTab = Me![tbxTest].TabIndex + 1 For Each frmCtl In Me.Controls Select Case frmCtl.ControlType...

Darnit - I meant to mention that you need to select "Yes" in the Key Preview property. Sorry for the double post. C

Fboo, Well, if you're using Access2000, in the form properties box there should be a property called: "Key Preview". (From Access Help): "You can use the KeyPreview property to specify whether the form-level keyboard event procedures are invoked before a control's keyboard event procedures."...

Brute force here: on the "On Key Down" event for each of the checkboxes insert code that reassigns the KeyCode value so that it's anything but 82 (which apparently is the value of the R key) Not sure you really want to do that, but it would solve your immediate problem. Coley

Thanks - figured it would be simple. There's your star. Coley

I have a file (test.log) that contains the string: TOTAL_MEMBERS in various places. I need to get a listing of the line that is always two lines above this string, but my version of grep apparently doesn't support the -C flag. Is there a way to get the information that I need? Example of file...

Jeremy, It's been a while since I did something like this, and it's not very elegant (but it always worked for me) - Try doing a .setfocus to another field in the form, then doing a .setfocus back to stepno (if you had a control named tbx_1) Me!tbx_1.SetFocus Me!stepno.SetFocus Coley

In looking at the documentation in the pdf, I have not been able to determine whether or not using a subcollaboration causes the data passed in (using the setInstanceMap() method) is parsed when .invoke for the subcollab is called. In 4.1.2 it is possible to actually remove the ($event-parse)...

I've been looking back through what we did, and I think the resolution to the problem was a change on the workflow side. We added an output argument to the End Step of the workflow: Property Name: Type: Value: Content-Type Literal text/html and that seemed to clear up all of those...

In one of the 4.1.2 (AIX) implementations I have been a part of, we saw eWay processes obtain large amounts of memory due to parsing and never 'release' that memory. This started to become a problem over time because there was less and less available memory for new processes to use, so we had...

This may be a bit clunky, but it seems to work - If the name of the column were Value enter the following into the Query grid (in separate columns): Column1: Int(Left([Value],InStr([Value]," ")-1))-Int(Right([Value],Len([value])-InStr(InStr([Value]," ")+1,[Value],&quot...

I'm rather new to the Siebel components and can't seem to get a response from the Upsert workflow that has been created. In the log it appears that a connection is being established and some handshaking is occuring, but there is just no response from the Siebel side when a login is attempted...