Thanks Everyone,
That's the information I'm Looking for.
Sorry If the post wasn't descriptive enough,
it looked good to me.
[smile] Brawn
- The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits -
Netscape has a JavaScript Console. So what does Internet Explorer have?
I Don't Know.
VB Code runs as interpreted code until it is compiled and it has an immediate window.
I want to know if Internet Explorer has the same functionality for JavaScript.
Brawn
- The difference between genius...
I want to access elements on a page to confirm there values without writing code into the actual Source itself.
I know an "alert" box in the source would do this but there must be another way.
script debugger would be an option also but I can't get it
working, it doesn't seem to...
The only way I can think, is to create a function that handles the form and returns the value.
public function getNumber()as integer
dim returnValue as integer
frmGetNumber.Show
returnvalue = frmGetNumber.gm_intSelecteNumber
frmGetNumber.Hide
getNumber = returnValue
End function...
I've been working with forms for a while and I don't have a 'style' developed yet. I keep thinking there must be something more than just accessing global variables.
You know how you can get the return value of msgbox.
if msgbox("Press Yes for msg.",vbYesNo) = vbYes then...
Can you 'Return' something from a form?
*without knowing where the form was called from?
[neutral] Brawn
- The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits -
I tried putting the align="center" option in the div tag but that doesn't seem to work either. I think the class must override it or something. Brawn
- The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits -
So,
I could have keywords in another table associated with a product, but when searching I could also use the product's description.
This would give me benifits of both methods.
[neutral] Brawn
- The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits -
Well, is setting an object to nothing really freeing memory or does it just change what the object references?
So the memory that was used by the object is just hanging out there somewhere for a while.
Maybe I just can't get rid of C++ habits?
I always have a Clear method in my objects to...
Hi,
Just doing a little cleanup here and setting my
strings to 'vbNullString' and my
objects to 'Nothing'.
what should i set my integers to?
Maybe 'vbEmpty'?
Any other "Clean Up" information or tips is also invited.,
[neutral] Brawn
- The difference between genius and stupidity is...
I want to raise an error if in debug mode but do something else if not.
I know theres a way, I just don't know what it is.
I DON'T want to set a global variable and have all my code check to see whether it is true or not becuase I want my objects as reusable as possible.
Any thoughts, [smile]...
Which is better:
rs("fieldName")
or
rs!fieldName
Pros?
Cons?
Any comments at all may be a help. Brawn
"My mind is my Shrine,
and my body the Temple around it."
-The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits-
I can't find a shortcut key,
is there a way to set one. Brawn
"My mind is my Shrine,
and my body the Temple around it."
-The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits-
Hey,
How do you make a block comment?
Thanks, [smile] Brawn
"My mind is my Shrine,
and my body the Temple around it."
-The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.